Okay, My Mom (who Is Not Married) Says That I Am Wearing My Wedding Rings Backwards…lol I Have The ?
Written by Admin on December 11, 2010engagement anulus 1st, then the start band. Forgive such a unsuited question, but I am correct, right?
Originally posted 2009-10-19 14:50:44. Republished by Old Post Promoter
Related posts:
- I Was Married For 6 Months, Now I Have The Wedding Rings And Need To Sell Them. What’s The Best Way? My wedlock was a misfortune and so I got it...
- Do Women Wear Wedding Rings Even If They Are Not Married? In person culture, some women crapper wager near to be...
- When Gay And Lesbian Couples Get Married Illegally, Do They Wear Their Wedding Rings On Their Right Hand? This handle isn’t meant to severance anyone, I was foregather...
- Do You Need To Have Wedding Rings To Get Married? technically i am intermeshed but i dont impact an occurrence...
- Why Do Married Women Wear Their Engagement And Wedding Rings At The Same Time? The occurrence anulus is so important. It is the “first...
Tags: Backwards...lol, Have, Married, Okay, Rings, Says, That, Wearing, wedding
Posted in wedding rings 18 Comments »
Posted in wedding rings 18 Comments »
18 Comments to “Okay, My Mom (who Is Not Married) Says That I Am Wearing My Wedding Rings Backwards…lol I Have The ?”
Leave a Comment
Improve the web with Nofollow Reciprocity.
8:56 pm on October 19th, 2009
Actually, your mom is right. The wedding band goes on first. It is supposed to be closet to your heart.Look it up.
2:50 am on October 20th, 2009
By “first” I presume you mean closest to the palm instead of toward the finger tips. I have heard of the old tradition but I can never remember which is “correct.”
A quick check of the Internet reveals that the tradition is that the wedding band should be worn on the “inside” of the engagement ring, since that puts it closer to the heart. Since the tradition is that the third-finger-left-hand contains the “vein of love” then this explanation seems to fit, somehow.
I guess your unmarried mother is right, about this detail anyway.
8:51 am on October 20th, 2009
This is according to Wikipedia:
“One interpretation states that the woman wears the wedding ring below the engagement ring, thus making it closer to the heart. Another practice holds that the woman should wear the wedding ring above the engagement ring, thus sealing the atmosphere of the engagement into the marriage. Still others prefer that the wedding ring should be worn alone. Further, modern ring sets in the United States are often marketed as a three-piece set, including the man’s wedding band, the woman’s engagement ring, and a slender band that is mounted to the engagement ring before the wedding, converting it into a single, permanent wedding ring.”
However, I have always understood it that the wedding ring goes first, then the engagement ring. That’s the way I wear mine.
8:54 am on October 20th, 2009
The wedding band should be put on first, so that it is closest to you. The engagement ring should be placed on the finger after the wedding ring, so to give you the opportunity to remove it as needed without taking off the wedding band. Diamonds are obviously not as durable and easy to wear while say…moving furniture etc. This is the ‘proper’ way to wear them…but to each their own..yeah?
11:49 am on October 20th, 2009
The wedding band goes on first then the engagement ring. Strange I know because you have to have removed the engagement ring to get the wedding ring on, which should have been done at the ceremony.
The reason for this? So the wedding ring is closer to your heart. Also the engagement ring is a newish invention.
Sorry hun, you are wrong on this one.
3:45 pm on October 20th, 2009
People wear it however they want. What makes you Happy? it depends on how you like it better. Go with what you want. I know that this is the “Correct” way Wedding band then engagement on top. but if it makes you more comfortable wearing the engagement ring then its up to you !
10:22 pm on October 20th, 2009
The reason you wear your wedding rings on your ring finger, left hand, is that there is a vein that goes directly to your heart — supposedly.
Anyhow, you should wear your wedding ring first so it is closest to your heart. Hope this helps.
12:34 am on October 21st, 2009
Well everyone is saying that the band goes first then the engagement ring… I plan to wear my engagement ring first and wedding band second because I’ll have my engagement ring on when he puts the wedding ring on my finger.. plus I like the way it looks.
6:19 am on October 21st, 2009
Its all up to personal preference. I wear mine with the engagement ring on top of the wedding band because the wedding band is a little on the big side and would fall off if I did not.
6:42 am on October 21st, 2009
The wedding band is supposed to be closer to your heart so it should be on your finger first then the engagement ring behind it. I think you have it right lol
12:17 pm on October 21st, 2009
Wedding band on fist then engagement ring towards finger nail, that way the wedding band is closest to the heart.
4:08 pm on October 21st, 2009
Nope – wedding ring should be the closest to the bottom of your finger – then the engagement ring. Your mom is right
8:52 pm on October 21st, 2009
Mrs. February is right – it’s band, then engagement ring.
10:25 pm on October 21st, 2009
Your mother is right. Wedding ring first, then engagement ring.
1:31 am on October 22nd, 2009
It doesn’t REALLY matter that much.
Just do whatever makes you and your husband happy…………….
6:17 am on October 22nd, 2009
Your mother is right.. Your wearing it wrong..
wedding band then engagment ring!!!
8:54 am on October 22nd, 2009
I wear it that way too!
2:55 pm on October 22nd, 2009
Engagement at the base of the ring finger and then the wedding ring.